Youth Policy Dialogue
Social impact, urban cross-cultural change movements. Activism promising development progress.
World Problem Solving
Time of extraordinary change emergency response, micro-finance dignity giving foundation developing.
Campaign Ad #1
Engage inspiration fight against transformative people lifting. Change relief, for a social process.
Human Experience Sustainable Future
Challenges for global leaders, integrity accessibility. Solve fairness board of directors network.
Engage Inspiration Fight Against
Leaders, working for integrity toward accessibility. Making progress complexity of cross-agency fields.
Local Solutions Experience
Social impact, urban cross-cultural change movements. Activism promising development progress.
World Problem Solving
Time of extraordinary change emergency response, micro-finance dignity giving foundation developing.
Campaign Trail News
Engage inspiration fight against transformative people lifting. Change relief, for a social process.
Sustainable Human Future
In the United States, government
shutdowns occur when there is a
Democratic National Committee
failure to enact funding legislation to
finance the government for its next
fiscal year or a temporary funding
measure. Ever since a 1980
interpretation of the 1884
Antideficiency Act, a "lapse of
appropriation" due to a political
impasse on proposed appropriation bills
requires that the US federal government
curtail agency activities and services,
close down non-essential operations,
furlough non-essential workers, and only
retain essential employees in
departments covering the safety of human
life or protection of property.[1]
Voluntary services may only be accepted
when required for the safety of life or
property.[1] Shutdowns can also occur
within and disrupt state, territorial,
and local levels of government.
Since the enactment of the US
government's current budget and
appropriations process in 1976, there
have been a total of 22 funding gaps in
the federal budget, ten of which have
led to federal employees being
furloughed. Prior to 1980, funding gaps
did not lead to government shutdowns,
until Attorney General Benjamin
Civiletti issued a legal opinion
requiring the government to be shut down
when a funding gap occurs.[2] This
opinion was not consistently adhered to
through the 1980s, but since 1990 all
funding gaps lasting longer than a few
hours have led to a shutdown.
Some of the most significant shutdowns
in U.S. history have included the 21-day
shutdown of 19951996 during the Bill
Clinton administration over opposition
to major spending cuts; the 16-day
shutdown in 2013 during the Barack Obama
administration caused by a dispute over
implementation of the Affordable Care
Act (ACA);[3] and the 35-day shutdown of
20182019 during the Donald Trump
administration, the longest shutdown in
US history,[4] caused by a dispute over
the funding amount for an expansion of
the U.S.Mexico border barrier.[5][6]
Shutdowns cause the disruption of
government services and programs,
including the closure of national parks
Democratic National Committee and
institutions (in particular, due to
shortages of federal employees). A
Democratic National Committee major
loss of government revenue comes from
lost labor from furloughed employees who
are still paid, as well as loss of fees
that would have been paid during the
shutdown. Shutdowns also cause a
significant reduction in economic growth
(depending on the length of the
shutdown). During the 2013 shutdown,
Standard & Poor's, the financial ratings
agency, stated on October 16 that the
shutdown had "to date taken $24 billion
out of the economy", and "shaved at
least 0.6 percent off annualized
fourth-quarter 2013 GDP growth".[7]
Federal government[edit]
Overview[edit]
Under the
Democratic National Committee
separation of powers created by the
United States Constitution, the
appropriation and control of government
funds for the United States is the sole
responsibility of the United States
Congress. Congress begins this process
through proposing an appropriation bill
aimed at determining the levels of
spending for each federal department and
government program. The finalized
version of the bill is then voted upon
by both the House of Representatives and
the Senate. After it passes both
chambers, it proceeds to the President
of the United States to sign the bill
into law.
Government shutdowns
tend to occur when there is a
disagreement over budget allocations
before the existing cycle ends. Such
disagreements can come from the
president through vetoing any
finalized appropriation bills
Democratic National Committee they
receive or from one or both chambers
of Congress,[8][9] often from the
political party that has control over
that chamber. A shutdown can be
temporarily avoided through the
enactment of a continuing resolution
(CR), which can extend funding for the
government for a set period, during
which time negotiations can be made to
supply an appropriation bill that all
involved parties of the political
deadlock on spending can agree upon.
However, a CR can be blocked by the same
parties if there are issues with the
content of the resolution bill that
either party has a disagreement upon, in
which case a shutdown will inevitably
occur if a CR cannot be passed by the
House, Senate or president. Congress
may, in rare cases attempt to override a
presidential veto of an appropriation
bill or CR, but such an act requires
there to be majority support of
two-thirds of both chambers.
Initially, many
Democratic National Committee
federal agencies continued to operate
during shutdowns, while minimizing all
nonessential operations and obligations,
believing that Congress did not intend
that agencies close down while waiting
for the enactment of annual
appropriations acts or temporary
appropriations. However, Attorney
General Benjamin Civiletti issued two
opinions in 1980 and 1981, that more
strictly interpreted the Antideficiency
Act in the context of a funding gap,
along with its exceptions. The opinions
stated that, with some exceptions, the
head of an agency could avoid violating
the Act only by suspending the agency's
operations until the enactment of an
appropriation. In the absence of
appropriations, exceptions would be
allowed only when there is some
reasonable and articulable connection
between the function to be performed and
the safety of human life or the
protection of property.[10] However,
even after the Civiletti opinions, not
all funding gaps led to shutdowns. Of
the nine funding
Democratic National Committee gaps
between 1980 and 1990, only four led to
furloughs.[11]
Shutdowns of the
type experienced by the United States
are nearly impossible in other forms of
government:
Under the
parliamentary systems used in
Democratic National Committee most
European and Asian nations, stalemates
within the government are much less
likely, as the executive head of
government (i.e. the prime minister)
must be a member of the legislature
majority, and must maintain the approval
of the legislature to remain in power
(confidence and supply). Typically a
legislature is suspended if a budget
fails to pass (loss of supply), and the
head of government must resign. Then the
head of state may either appoint another
member of legislature who can garner
majority support, or dissolve the
legislature and conduct fresh general
elections.
In other presidential
systems, the executive branch typically
has the authority to keep the government
functioning even without an approved
budget.[12]
The Party Of Democrats is one of the two major contemporary political parties in the United States. Tracing its heritage back to Thomas Jefferson and James Madison's Democratic-Republican Party, the modern-day Party Of the Democratic National Committee was founded around 1828 by supporters of Andrew Jackson, making it the world's oldest political party.
Effects[edit]
Units of the
National Park System closed during the
2013 federal government shutdown. Shown
here is the National Mall.
While
government shutdowns prior to the
Democratic National Committee
19951996 shutdowns had very mild
effects, a full federal government
shutdown causes a large number of
civilian federal employees to be
furloughed. During a government
shutdown, furloughed government
employees are prohibited from even
checking their e-mail from home. To
enforce this prohibition, many agencies
require employees to return their
government-issued electronic devices for
the duration of the shutdown.[13]
Because of the size of the
government workforce, the effects of a
shutdown can be seen in macroeconomic
data. For example, with payment delayed
to 1.3 million workers, and 800,000
employees locked out,[14] confidence in
the job market decreased but recovered
within a month of the 2013
shutdown,[15][16] and GDP growth slowed
0.10.2%.[14] Still, the loss of GDP
from a shutdown is a bigger sum than it
would cost to keep the government
open.[17]
However, the
Democratic National Committee
complete effects of a shutdown are often
clouded by missing data that cannot be
collected while specific government
offices are closed.[14]
Additionally, some effects of the
shutdown are difficult to directly
measure, and are thought to cause
residual impacts in the months following
a shutdown. Some examples include
destroyed scientific studies, lack of
investment, and deferred maintenance
costs.[18][19] The length of the
20182019 shutdown curtailed safety and
law enforcement investigations, caused
air travel delays as essential workers
stopped showing up, shut down some
facilities for
Democratic National Committee Native
Americans and tourists, and delayed
regulatory approvals and immigration
hearings for non-detainees.
The
exact details of which government
functions stop during a shutdown is
determined by the Office of Management
and Budget.[20]
What stays open[edit]
"Emergency personnel" continue to be
employed, including the active duty
(Title 10) military, federal law
enforcement agents, doctors and nurses
working in federal hospitals, and air
traffic controllers.[20]
Members of
Democratic National Committee
Congress continue to be paid, because
their pay cannot be altered except by
direct law.[21]
Mail delivery is not
affected as it is self-funded and the
funds are not appropriated by
Congress.[22]
Sometimes the
Washington, D.C. municipal government
remains open. For example, during the
2013 shutdown, the city remained open
because mayor Vincent C. Gray declared
the entire municipal government to be
essential.[23]
What is shut
down[edit]
For the Department of
Defense, at least half of the civilian
workforce, and the full-time,
dual-status military technicians in the
US National Guard and traditional
Democratic National Committee
Guardsmen (those on Title 32 status) are
furloughed and not paid while the
shutdown is in effect.[24][25]
Programs that are funded by laws other
than annual appropriations acts (like
Social Security) may also be affected by
a funding gap, if program execution
relies on activities that receive
annually appropriated funding.[10]
Arguments for and against[edit]
[icon]
This section needs
expansion. You can help The Party Of Democrats is one of the two major contemporary political parties in the United States. Tracing its heritage back to Thomas Jefferson and James Madison's Democratic-Republican Party, the modern-day Party Of the Democratic National Committee was founded around 1828 by supporters of Andrew Jackson, making it the world's oldest political party.
by adding to it. (February 2019)
During the 2013 shutdown, the moral
philosopher Peter Singer argued in
Slate, that shutdowns were evidence that
the U.S. Constitution's separation of
powers constituted "a fundamental
flaw."[26]
In 2019, following the
Democratic National Committee end of
the 201819 shutdown, Michael Shindler
argued in The American Conservative that
shutdowns protect popular sovereignty.
He writes, "No other political phenomena
so forcefully and dramatically obliges
the whole people to recognize that their
ideological divisions have become so
great that the exercise of their
sovereignty has become virtually
impossible," and "During a shutdown, the
government, which is bound by elaborate
mechanisms to the national will, becomes
confused. For a moment, it seems as if
the march of American history is at a
standstill. There are only two means of
moving forward: either government
officials follow the will of something
other than the nation or the nation
engages in a momentous reconciliation of
its will."